Important Cases for AIBE Exam 2025, Topic Wise Landmark Judgements, Benefits

 

Important Cases for AIBE Exam 2025: The All India Bar Examination (AIBE) evaluates a law student’s understanding of major court cases in India. These cases shaped the Indian judicial system over the years. They help judges, lawyers, and students interpret critical cases. 

Understanding Important Cases for AIBE Exam 2025 helps students learn the important rights, legal rules, and ideas of the Indian judiciary. Each judgement provides details on certain aspects. These cases guide the AIBE syllabus and help a student answer questions effectively. So knowing the Important Cases for the AIBE Exam 2025 becomes very important. 

AIBE Important Cases – Topic Wise

This section categorises the Important Cases for AIBE Exam 2025 topic-wise. This helps students prepare in an effective manner. The topic-wise cases are provided in the table below:

AIBE Important Cases Topic Wise
Topics Important Cases
Fundamental Rights Cases – These cases protect core freedoms.
  • Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978)
  • K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India (2017)
  • Navtej Singh Johar vs Union of India (2018)
Constitutional Amendment Cases – These cases have explained Parliament’s power to change the Constitution.
  • Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (1973)
  • Minerva Mills vs Union of India (1980)
Reservation and Equality Cases – These cases define fairness in public opportunities.
  • Indira Sawhney vs Union of India (1992)
  • M. Nagaraj vs Union of India (2006)
Criminal Law and Investigation Cases – These cases protect rights during criminal trials.
  • DK Basu vs State of West Bengal (1997)
  • Lalita Kumari vs Government of Uttar Pradesh (2013)
Women’s Rights Cases – These cases protect dignity, equality, and safety.
  • Vishaka vs State of Rajasthan (1997)
  • Shah Bano Case (1985)
Environment Protection Cases – These cases promote a clean and safe environment.
  • MC Mehta vs Union of India (Multiple cases)
  • Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India (1996)
Public Interest and Welfare Cases – These cases expand rights for poor communities.
  • Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)
  • Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs Union of India (1984)
Technology and Digital Freedom Cases – These cases protect digital rights.
  • Shreya Singhal vs Union of India (2015)

 

Landmark Judgements for AIBE 20 Exam 2025

Here, we have covered the most important judgments that law graduates must cover for AIBE 20. These cases helped create effective legal rules that guide the Indian judiciary. Each judgement listed below is among the most Important Cases for the AIBE 20 Exam 2025.

Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (1973)

This case introduced the “Basic Structure Doctrine.” It says Parliament can change the Constitution, but cannot damage its core. It protects democracy. 

Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978)

This case widened the scope of Article 21. It declared that life and personal freedom require fairness, justice, and reason. It changed the ways courts interpret fundamental rights. It is one of the most Important Cases for the AIBE Exam 2025.

Indira Sawhney vs Union of India (1992)

The case talked about reservation rules in India. It fixed the 27% limit for OBC reservations. It set the 50% cap for total reservations and highlighted equality and social justice.

Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum (1985)

It protected Muslim women’s right to maintenance and strengthened women’s rights in India. It is very relevant for questions on personal laws.

Navtej Singh Johar vs Union of India (2018)

This case ended Section 377 for consenting adults and upheld dignity and personal choice. It is part of modern rights-based cases that appear in AIBE.

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India (2017)

The case declared privacy as a fundamental right. It said the Constitution protects personal choices, data, and dignity and is one of the most relevant Important Cases for the AIBE Exam 2025.

Vishaka vs State of Rajasthan (1997)

In this case, protection against workplace harassment was introduced and created guidelines for employers. It protects dignity at work and is part of AIBE’s public interest scope.

S.R. Bommai vs Union of India (1994)

This case limited the misuse of the President’s Rule and stressed on federal balance. It protects fairness between the Centre and States.

Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

This case declared that the right to livelihood is part of Article 21. It protects the urban poor and shows the ways using which courts can expand the scope of fundamental rights.

Shreya Singhal vs Union of India (2015)

This case struck down Section 66A of the IT Act and protected online free speech. It is a key case for internet rights questions in AIBE.

 

AIBE Previous Year Question Papers

Benefits of Important Cases for AIBE Exam 2025

Reading the Important Cases for AIBE Exam 2025 provides several benefits for law graduates. It helps them score well and perform well in the AIBE exam. The advantages and benefits related to the important cases for the AIBE exam are as follows:

  • Builds a strong understanding: Students learn why courts made specific decisions. It helps them build critical thinking.

  • Improves answer quality: AIBE questions often contain questions on principles established in famous cases. Knowing them helps students answer quickly.

  • Explains constitutional ideas: Cases like Maneka Gandhi or Kesavananda Bharati demonstrate the protection of rights.

  • Helps with legal reasoning: Through these cases, law graduates understand how judges consider arguments. They learn how reasoning leads to fair decisions.

  • Supports practical learning: These important cases have addressed a lot of practical issues that have existed in Indian society.

Explore the Judiciary Coaching to access essential resources for Judiciary exam preparation, including detailed insights and strategies. Dive into the Judiciary for structured courses and focused study plans designed to help aspirants excel in their exams.

 

 

Partner in Zista legalis , Mainly practiced in the field of Corporate law, Real estate, cyber law, Family law and labour matters, Advisor for many startup companies, firms and NGOs, and successfully handled cases representing many high stake companies. Conducted full fledged trials, contemporary cyber frauds and helped in recovering amounts. He is also a member of many NGOs and organizations, and legal advisor for companies.

Leave a Reply